Towards a comprehensive methodology for ecotoxicological assessment: Prioritizing plant protection products for mixture testing in edge-of-field surface waterbodies.

dc.contributor.authorAbrantes, Nelson
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Joana Luísa
dc.contributor.authorMuñiz González, Ana Belén
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorNavarro, Irene
dc.contributor.authorDe la Torre, Adrián
dc.contributor.authorMartínez, María Ángeles
dc.contributor.authorOsman, Rima
dc.contributor.authorKhurshid, Chrow
dc.contributor.authorHarkes, Paula
dc.contributor.authorHuerta Lwanga, Esperanza
dc.contributor.authorAlcon, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorContreras, Josefa
dc.contributor.authorBaldi, Isabelle
dc.contributor.authorBureau, Mathilde
dc.contributor.authorAlaoui, Abdallah
dc.contributor.authorChrist, Florian
dc.contributor.authorMandrioli, Daniele
dc.contributor.authorSgargi, Daria
dc.contributor.authorPasković, Igor
dc.contributor.authorPolić Pasković, Marija
dc.contributor.authorGlavan, Matjaž
dc.contributor.authorHofman, Jakub
dc.contributor.authorNorgaard, Trine
dc.contributor.authorAparicio, Virginia
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Vera
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-06T10:31:36Z
dc.date.available2024-11-06T10:31:36Z
dc.date.issued2024-11-06
dc.descriptionDOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177322es_ES
dc.description.abstractPesticide applications in agriculture result in complex mixtures of Plant Protection Products (PPPs) in the environment. The ecotoxicological effects of these mixtures can occur at concentrations considered safe for in dividual chemicals, indicating potential risks underestimated by current regulatory assessments focused on in dividual active ingredients. To address this challenge, our study introduces a methodology for identifying priority PPPs for formulating mixtures, enabling further ecotoxicological testing in water and sediment com partments of edge-of-field surface water bodies, targeting pelagic and benthic organisms. This methodology was primarily based on the actual quantification of PPPs present in these compartments from selected case study sites (CSSs) in Europe and Argentina (11 and 4 for water and sediments, respectively). A conceptual framework was developed that discriminates and selects concerning PPPs based on their individual risk quotient and frequency of occurrence in each CSS, drawing upon two EU regulatory risk assessment approaches, i.e., the general approach under REACH for any environmental contaminant of concern – the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) approach; and that specifically focusing on PPPs – the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) approach. Irrespective of whether the focus is on water or sediments, the study revealed disparities in PPP rankings depending on the approach used to identify PPPs of concern, with the ECHA approach being more conservative than the EFSA approach. Despite this, the EFSA approach follows a more standardized assessment factor defi nition strategy, potentially allowing avoidance of risk overestimation, as well as resulting in a more balanced representation of different PPP classes for subsequent mixtures testing. Overall, the methodological development reported herein, along with the inconsistencies found when comparing different regulatory approaches to assess the risk of environmental contaminants, highlight the need for further discussion on the most appropriate di rections towards the standardization of the regulatory risk assessment of PPP mixtures.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis publication owes its funding to the SPRINT project funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 Program for research and innova tion under grant agreement no. 862568. The authors would also like to thank all members of the SPRINT consortium and all participants at Case Study Sites for their support of this publication and SPRINT activities. We also acknowledge the financial support to CESAM by FCT/MCTES (UIDP/50017/2020+UIDB/50017/2020+ LA/P/0094/2020), through national funds. Thanks are also due to the Margarita Salas Postdoctoral fellowship (REGAGE21e00018296847) funded by National Distance Education University (UNED) and”Next Generation EU” funds attributed to Ana Belén Muñiz González.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14855/3563
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseriesScience of the Total Environment;956 (2024) 177322.
dc.rights.accessRightsembargoed accesses_ES
dc.subjectPesticideses_ES
dc.subjectFreshwateres_ES
dc.subjectRisk assessmentes_ES
dc.subjectMixtureses_ES
dc.subjectRisk quotientes_ES
dc.titleTowards a comprehensive methodology for ecotoxicological assessment: Prioritizing plant protection products for mixture testing in edge-of-field surface waterbodies.es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Aviso_Documento_embargado_temporalmente.pdf
Size:
30 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format