Towards a comprehensive methodology for ecotoxicological assessment: Prioritizing plant protection products for mixture testing in edge-of-field surface waterbodies.
| dc.contributor.author | Abrantes, Nelson | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pereira, Joana Luísa | |
| dc.contributor.author | Muñiz González, Ana Belén | |
| dc.contributor.author | Campos, Isabel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Navarro, Irene | |
| dc.contributor.author | De la Torre, Adrián | |
| dc.contributor.author | Martínez, María Ángeles | |
| dc.contributor.author | Osman, Rima | |
| dc.contributor.author | Khurshid, Chrow | |
| dc.contributor.author | Harkes, Paula | |
| dc.contributor.author | Huerta Lwanga, Esperanza | |
| dc.contributor.author | Alcon, Francisco | |
| dc.contributor.author | Contreras, Josefa | |
| dc.contributor.author | Baldi, Isabelle | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bureau, Mathilde | |
| dc.contributor.author | Alaoui, Abdallah | |
| dc.contributor.author | Christ, Florian | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mandrioli, Daniele | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sgargi, Daria | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pasković, Igor | |
| dc.contributor.author | Polić Pasković, Marija | |
| dc.contributor.author | Glavan, Matjaž | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hofman, Jakub | |
| dc.contributor.author | Norgaard, Trine | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aparicio, Virginia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Silva, Vera | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-06T10:31:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-11-06T10:31:36Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-11-06 | |
| dc.description | DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177322 | es_ES |
| dc.description.abstract | Pesticide applications in agriculture result in complex mixtures of Plant Protection Products (PPPs) in the environment. The ecotoxicological effects of these mixtures can occur at concentrations considered safe for in dividual chemicals, indicating potential risks underestimated by current regulatory assessments focused on in dividual active ingredients. To address this challenge, our study introduces a methodology for identifying priority PPPs for formulating mixtures, enabling further ecotoxicological testing in water and sediment com partments of edge-of-field surface water bodies, targeting pelagic and benthic organisms. This methodology was primarily based on the actual quantification of PPPs present in these compartments from selected case study sites (CSSs) in Europe and Argentina (11 and 4 for water and sediments, respectively). A conceptual framework was developed that discriminates and selects concerning PPPs based on their individual risk quotient and frequency of occurrence in each CSS, drawing upon two EU regulatory risk assessment approaches, i.e., the general approach under REACH for any environmental contaminant of concern – the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) approach; and that specifically focusing on PPPs – the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) approach. Irrespective of whether the focus is on water or sediments, the study revealed disparities in PPP rankings depending on the approach used to identify PPPs of concern, with the ECHA approach being more conservative than the EFSA approach. Despite this, the EFSA approach follows a more standardized assessment factor defi nition strategy, potentially allowing avoidance of risk overestimation, as well as resulting in a more balanced representation of different PPP classes for subsequent mixtures testing. Overall, the methodological development reported herein, along with the inconsistencies found when comparing different regulatory approaches to assess the risk of environmental contaminants, highlight the need for further discussion on the most appropriate di rections towards the standardization of the regulatory risk assessment of PPP mixtures. | es_ES |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This publication owes its funding to the SPRINT project funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 Program for research and innova tion under grant agreement no. 862568. The authors would also like to thank all members of the SPRINT consortium and all participants at Case Study Sites for their support of this publication and SPRINT activities. We also acknowledge the financial support to CESAM by FCT/MCTES (UIDP/50017/2020+UIDB/50017/2020+ LA/P/0094/2020), through national funds. Thanks are also due to the Margarita Salas Postdoctoral fellowship (REGAGE21e00018296847) funded by National Distance Education University (UNED) and”Next Generation EU” funds attributed to Ana Belén Muñiz González. | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0048-9697 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14855/3563 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Science of the Total Environment;956 (2024) 177322. | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | embargoed access | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Pesticides | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Freshwater | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Risk assessment | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Mixtures | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Risk quotient | es_ES |
| dc.title | Towards a comprehensive methodology for ecotoxicological assessment: Prioritizing plant protection products for mixture testing in edge-of-field surface waterbodies. | es_ES |
| dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Aviso_Documento_embargado_temporalmente.pdf
- Size:
- 30 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format

