Comparative study of different Sn wetted W CPSs exposed to NBI fluxes in the OLMAT facility

dc.contributor.authorOyarzabal, E.
dc.contributor.authorTabares, F.L.
dc.contributor.authorLiniers, M.
dc.contributor.authorAlegre, D.
dc.contributor.authorTafalla, D.
dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy, K.J.
dc.contributor.authorde Castro, A.
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, T.W.
dc.contributor.authorScholte, J.G.A.
dc.contributor.authorIafrati, M.
dc.contributor.authorde la Cal, E.
dc.contributor.authorVoldimer, I.
dc.contributor.authorAscasíbar, E.
dc.contributor.authorSoleto, A.
dc.contributor.authorOLMAT team
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-16T16:08:48Z
dc.date.available2024-02-16T16:08:48Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-01
dc.description.abstractFour different tin-wetted, tungsten CPS (Capillary Porous System) targets where exposed to NBI pulses in the OLMAT High Heat flux (HHF) facility. They include two flexible ones placed on a TZM support (W meshes and W felt) and two compact ones (sintered W disk and 3D printed W). A comparative study was performed using a fastframe imaging camera and an infrared pyrometer. Surface temperature increase and homogeneity, particle ejection, CPS damage and overall behaviour were studied for each case. Sn drop/accumulation at the lower part of the targets was observed for all cases when they are heated up to around 400 ◦C except for the 3D printed W target that has its own Sn deposit. The 3D printed W target presented the best results in all aspects, withstanding heat pulses up to 58 MW/m2 in 100 ms without any damage or particle ejection. On the other hand, the W mesh targets displayed damage at 20 MW/m2 due to a bad thermal contact with the deposit, while the sintered W disk developed a crack during a series of 15 MW/m2 NBI pulses. As might be expected, a reduced increase of temperature during pulses is observed for the two compact W targets. The results and their relevance for the design of a Sn wetted W CPS for application as a DEMO-divertor material are discussed in the present work.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium, funded by the European Union via the Euratom Research and Training Programme (Grant Agreement No 101052200 - EUROfusion). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Commission. Neither the European Union nor the European Commission can be held responsible for them.es_ES
dc.identifier.citation[1] E. Oyarzabal et al, Fusion Engineering and Design 190 (2023) 113711.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0920-3796
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14855/2638
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFusion Engineering and Designes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseries190;113711
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subjectCPSes_ES
dc.subjectLiquid metalses_ES
dc.subjectHHF facilitieses_ES
dc.subjectDEMOes_ES
dc.subjectDEMO divertores_ES
dc.subjectPWIes_ES
dc.subjectNBIes_ES
dc.titleComparative study of different Sn wetted W CPSs exposed to NBI fluxes in the OLMAT facilityes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Oyarzabal et al. - 2023 - Comparative study of different Sn wetted W CPSs ex.pdf
Size:
12.48 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format