BENTONITE SWELLING INTO A VOID UNDER SUCTION OR WATER FLOW

dc.contributor.authorVillar, María Victoria
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez-Álvarez, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Gemma
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-26T09:42:40Z
dc.date.available2024-01-26T09:42:40Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-20
dc.description.abstractIn the context of the deep geological disposal of nuclear waste and to improve the understanding of the homogenisation process of bentonite barriers, in particular with regards to the filling of technological voids, tests were performed with compacted FEBEX bentonite samples hydrated under limited axial swelling conditions. The samples were saturated from the top surface using the vapour transfer technique (imposing suctions of 6 and 0.5 MPa), or with deionised water injected at a low flow rate either from the bottom surface or from the gap on top. The final water content of the samples saturated via vapour transfer was related to the suction imposed during the tests according to the water retention curve. Thus, the final water content of the samples tested under suction 6 MPa was lower and not enough to allow sufficient bentonite swelling to close the gap. In contrast, the samples saturated under suction 0.5 MPa reached higher water contents and were able to fill the gap before the equilibrium water content had been reached. In the tests performed with liquid water supplied through the gap, the samples were able to swell easily into the open void and the gap closed earlier than when hydration took place from the opposite end. In all the tests the final water content of the bentonite was higher and the dry density lower towards the hydration surface. These gradients were more remarkable and persistent as the initial strain was larger. No completely homogeneous density or water content distribution was observed in any of the tests. These changes were also reflected in the pore size distribution. The pores of size larger than the upper limit of mercury intrusion porosimetry (550 µm) were also quantified, which allowed a better representation of the pore size distribution of the more swollen samples. Although the void ratio corresponding to pores smaller than 200 nm (em) was initially higher, over time the volume of macropores (eM) increased more, giving place to an overall decrease of the em/eM ratio, which tended to be constant along the samples in the longest tests. In the first stages of hydration the macropore void ratio and size considerably increased close to the gap in the tests with saturation from it.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEuratom Research and Training Programme 2014–2018 under grant agreement number 745942, project BEACONes_ES
dc.identifier.citationActa Geotechnica 18(3): 1495-1513es_ES
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01702-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14855/2208
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subjectbentonitees_ES
dc.subjectself-sealinges_ES
dc.subjectswellinges_ES
dc.subjectporosityes_ES
dc.subjecttechnological voides_ES
dc.titleBENTONITE SWELLING INTO A VOID UNDER SUCTION OR WATER FLOWes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
gap filling accepted.pdf
Size:
3.04 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format