Comparison of Thermal and Laser-Reduced Graphene Oxide Production for Energy Storage Applications

dc.contributor.authorGómez-Mancebo, María Belén
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Martínez, Rodolfo
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Perona, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorRubio, Verónica
dc.contributor.authorBastante, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Pérez, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorBorlaf, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorSánchez, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorHamada, Assia
dc.contributor.authorVelasco, Andrés
dc.contributor.authorRyu, Yu Kyoung
dc.contributor.authorCalle, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorBonales, Laura J.
dc.contributor.authorQuejido, Alberto J.
dc.contributor.authorMartínez, Javier
dc.contributor.authorRucandio, Isabel
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T11:58:33Z
dc.date.available2024-02-05T11:58:33Z
dc.date.issued2024-02-05
dc.description.abstractA way to obtain graphene-based materials on a large-scale level is by means of chemical methods for the oxidation of graphite to obtain graphene oxide (GO), in combination with thermal, laser, chemical and electrochemical reduction methods to produce reduced graphene oxide (rGO). Among these methods, thermal and laser-based reduction processes are attractive, due to their fast and low-cost characteristics. In this study, first a modified Hummer's method was applied to obtain graphite oxide (GrO)/graphene oxide. Subsequently, an electrical furnace, a fusion instrument, a tubular reactor, a heating plate, and a microwave oven were used for the thermal reduction, and UV and CO2 lasers were used for the photothermal and/or photochemical reduction. The chemical and structural characterizations of the fabricated rGO samples were performed by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Raman spectroscopy measurements. The analysis and comparison of the results revealed that the strongest feature of the thermal reduction methods is the production of high specific surface area, fundamental for volumetric energy applications such as hydrogen storage, whereas in the case of the laser reduction methods, a highly localized reduction is achieved, ideal for microsupercapacitors in flexible electronics.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipGrants ENE2017-88065-C2-1-R and -2-R funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF A way of making Europe; Grants PID2020-114234RB-C21 and -C22 funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033; Project FEDER 2004 CIEM05-34-031. Spanish Government Grant FPU18/03235 MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 “ESF Investing in your future”. Comunidad de Madrid project NMAT2D-CM (P2018/NMT-4511); MINCIN and Comunidad de Madrid, (MAD2D-CM)-UPM1es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2079-4991
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14855/2321
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNANOMATERIALS, 13 (8), (2023);DOI 10.3390/nano13081391
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subjectHydrogen storagees_ES
dc.subjectGraphite oxidees_ES
dc.subjectParticle size reductiones_ES
dc.subjectSupercapacitorses_ES
dc.subjectNanocompositees_ES
dc.subjectSpectroscopyes_ES
dc.subjectTemperature estabilityes_ES
dc.subjectFilmses_ES
dc.titleComparison of Thermal and Laser-Reduced Graphene Oxide Production for Energy Storage Applicationses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
23Nanomaterials_Comparison T&L-rGO.pdf
Size:
5.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format