Assessment of a pilot solar V-trough reactor for solar water disinfection

dc.contributor.authorMartínez-García, Azahara
dc.contributor.authorVincent, Martin
dc.contributor.authorRubiolo, Vivian
dc.contributor.authorDomingos, Marcelo
dc.contributor.authorCanela, María Cristina
dc.contributor.authorOller, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorFernandez-Ibáñez, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorPolo López, María Inmaculada
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-07T17:28:59Z
dc.date.available2024-02-07T17:28:59Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-02
dc.description.abstractRural and isolated communities of low-income countries suffer the lack of access to safe drinking water. Harvested rainwater (HRW) is becoming an alternative source of freshwater in many areas of the world. Nevertheless, its quality usually doesn’t meet drinking water standards, posing a health risk for human consumption. Solar water disinfection – SODIS – is a low-cost household intervention used to disinfect water. In this work, we investigate a new solar photoreactor based on V-trough mirrors as alternative to the most used Compound Parabolic Collector (CPC) geometry at pilot scale (54 and 32 L per batch), with the aim of reducing costs and reactor surface’s footprint. An experimental assessment of two key parameters as water recirculation and mirror geometry was carried out. For this study several water-pathogens commonly found in HRW were used, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Salmonella enteritidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Best results were obtained with the V-trough reactor in static condition, where>5-LRV (log-reduction value) for all bacteria tested were reached with a solar-UVA dose of 254 kJ m−2 (90 min). At this operational condition, a total volume of 162 L (3 batches) of water were treated in one full sunny day in Spain (300 min of effective treatment time). A comparison between CPC and V-trough mirrors resulted in similar disinfection efficiencies even if the actinometric results showed that CPC collects 1.58 times more photon flux than the V-trough in the solar-UVA region. These results show the great performance of the V-trough mirror for this application, which is cheaper to produce than CPC and permits treating higher amounts (66% more) of water for the same collector area and same treatment time.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean project WATERSPOUTT H2020-Water-5c-2015 (GA 688928).es_ES
dc.identifier.citationChemical Engineering Journal. 399, pp. 125719. 2020es_ES
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125719
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14855/2406
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.subjectV-trough collectores_ES
dc.subjectCPC collectores_ES
dc.subjectE. colies_ES
dc.subjectE. faecalises_ES
dc.subjectS. enteritidises_ES
dc.subjectP. aeruginosaes_ES
dc.titleAssessment of a pilot solar V-trough reactor for solar water disinfectiones_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2020. CEJ 399 (2020) 125719 (Azahara_reactor CPC_U).pdf
Size:
990.05 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format